Schuh-Werk2024
Proposition: A healthy and painfree body is able to move without limit! Derivation 1: Handikaps, Blockages and pain restrict normal movement, no matter on which level of the body. Derivation 2: Shoes and/or insoles of any kind, have positive or negative effects to the mobillity of the body. Conclusion: When „manipulations“ at/under the feet are set, you can proof the changes of static, if they are clearly masurable in the top-joint(altlas-skull base). More accurate: Everything whats „happens“ at/under the feet, actes through the biomechanical systems(skeleton, joints, muscles and fascia) from the bottom to the top. See: Tom Meyr´s Anatomie Trains, et all. Measurements: 1. Mensuration: barefoot. >>returns the basic value! 2. Mensuration: with insoles, shoes,…. Rating: If the head-rotation is better than „barefoot“, the maipulation has authorisation. If the haed-rotation is worse, it can be assumed, that the manipulation causes blockages. For the proof, whether this results could be positive or negative, you find with HMSU a simple and yet widely devise. Get the impact of shoes, heel-hights, insoles, ortheses, portheses, till to sock and stockings for the well- bing of your patients/customers.
2018: Impact of insoles with individual sensoric feedback to the kranio-cervikale mobillity while standing and the roll motion from feet while walking. Dietmar Basta, Wolfgang P. Schallmey , Arneborg Ernst
6/2018: Studie bySabine Bayr with HMSU support: More head mobility (lateral rotation) & muscl relaxation by herbal eyedrops
7/2017: Puplication: OT, Haedrotation as a basis for measurement, to demonstrate the effect of insoles.
Application
Download Download Download Download Download Download
Study presentation at the OST Congress2023
Schuh-Werk 2024
application
Proposition: A healthy and pain free body is able to move without limit! Derivation 1: Handikaps, blockages and pain restrict normal movement, no matter which level of the body. Derivation 2: Shoes and/or insoles of any kind, have positive or negative effect to the mobillity of the body. Conclusion: When „manipulations“ at/under the feet are set, you can proof changes of static, if they are clearly masurable in the top-joint(altlas-skull base). More accurate: Everything whats „happens“ at/under the feet, actes through the biomechanical systems(skeleton, joints, muscles and fascia) from the bottom to the top. See: Tom Meyr´s Anatomie Trains, et all. Measurements: 1. Mensuration: barefoot. >>returns the basic value! 2. Mensuration: with insoles, shoes,…. Rating: If head-rotation is better than „barefoot“, the maipulation has authorisation. If haed-rotation is worse, it can be assumed, that the placed manipulation causes blockages For the proof, whether this results could be positive or negative, you find with HMSU a simple and yet widely devise. Get the impact of shoes, heel-hights, insoles, ortheses, portheses, till to sock and stockings for the well being of your patients/customers.
2018: Impact of insoles with individual sensoric feedback to the kranio-cervikale mobillity while standing and the roll motion from feet while walking. Dietmar Basta, Wolfgang P. Schallmey , Arneborg Ernst
7/2017: Puplication: OT, Haedrotation as a basis for measurement, to demonstrate the effect of insoles.
6/2018: Studie by Sabine Bayr with HMSU support: More head mobility (lateral rotation) & muscl relaxation by herbal eyedrops
Download Download Download Download Download Download
Study presentation at the OST Congress2023